Examples of Reference Books on the Law

The law is a vast body of knowledge that governs the conduct of human beings. The fundamental principles of legal order are described in this article, as are the institutions that enforce the rule of law. Legal obligations and neutrality are also discussed. Below are some examples of reference books on the law:

Principles of legal order

Schlegelberger’s principles of legal order are embodied in his goals of consistency and independence. These goals imply substantive goals such as the protection of individual rights and security. In this regard, his views and conduct largely support Gruchmann’s claim that Schlegelberger’s legal doctrine is based on misinterpretation of the Weimar period. He suggests that Unger misunderstands the importance of equitable resolution.

Institutions that enforce the rule of law

The Nigeria Police Force is one of the key institutions in preventing crime and enforcing the rule of law. The police also serve as the first responders to crime. Their contacts with the public impact access to justice and the criminal justice system. Police officers ensure high-quality investigations and successful prosecutions, but they are also prone to corruption. The following are some examples of corruption among police officers. To prevent such cases, the Nigeria Police Force focuses on training and equipping its personnel with necessary knowledge and tools.

Neutrality

The concept of neutrality in law is not new. In fact, it originated in the nineteenth century and was codified in several Hague Conferences. The No. 3 Hague Conference convention requires neutrals to receive notice of the start of hostilities. The No. 5 convention outlines the rights and duties of neutrals during war on land. The No. 11 Hague Conference convention restricts the right to capture a neutral in a naval war.

Coercive enforcement

Some people endorse the notion that coercive enforcement of law is just. But they don’t see the point in coercive enforcement if certain laws and legal arrangements are not justified. This view is flawed. A law can be just because it is justified. But that doesn’t mean that it is always legal. Here’s a look at the history of coercive enforcement of law. Let’s examine some of the arguments for and against it.